Buhari Gets NJC Recommendation To Approve Tanko As CJN

With the recommendation of the National Judicial Council, the coast
seems clear for Acting Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Ibrahim Tanko
Muhammad to mount the saddle as CJN. President Muhammadu Buhari is
likely to accept the NJC’s recommendation that Justice Muhammad should
be CJN.

But Buhari is said to be weighing whether or not to accept the NJC’s
recommendations on the suspended Chief Justice of Nigeria ( CJN),
Justice Walter Onnoghen.

Buhari, according to The Nation, who had a meeting with Vice President
Yemi Osinbajo on the issue before flying out to Jordan yesterday, is
also said to be seeking legal opinions on the NJC’s decisions.

The NJC absolved Justice Muhammad of any blame in deferring to the President to be sworn in as the Acting CJN.

He accepted the appointment, having been presented with an ex parte
order of the CCT, which led to Justice Onnoghen’s suspension.

The Nation learnt that after receiving the NJC’s recommendations, the President elected to seek legal advice on them.

A top government official, who pleaded not to be named because he was
not permitted to talk on the matter, said the President was considering:

  • whether or not NJC’s conclusions on findings on Onnoghen did not amount to indictment;
  • if he should accept NJC’s soft-landing decision to retire Justice Onnoghen with full benefits;
  • Onnoghen’s retirement without benefits; and
  • whether
    the law should run its full course, including the conclusion of
    Onnoghen’s trial by the Code of Conduct Tribunal and a fresh trial by
    the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

Buhari is also believed to be thinking of asking NJC to recommend
deterrence for Onnoghen or seeking further consultations with the

The President is also said to be planning to seek advice on whether the input of the Senate necessary in retiring Onnoghen?

The source said: “Since he received the NJC’s recommendations, the
President has been thinking of how to manage the situation without
rubbishing the anti-corruption agenda of his administration. He has the
right to accept or reject the council’s recommendations on Onnoghen.

“The President is already seeking legal opinion on legal issues
surrounding the NJC’s decisions. He does not want to set a bad precedent
in tackling this Onnoghengate”.

The source confirmed that the President met with Vice President Yemi
Osinbajo. He believed Onnoghen’s case and other matters were discussed.

Responding to a question, the source said: “What NJC decided was a kind
of soft-landing for Onnoghen with moral and legal implications.

“Apart from stepping down, there are concerns about what Onnoghen is
really offering as deterrent. Some are saying why can’t the law run its
full course?

“Others are pressurising the government to take advantage of the window
created by the NJC to rebuild the ties between the Executive and the
Judiciary as a result of Onnoghen’s travails.”

It was unclear whether or not the President would need the consent of the Senate to retire Onnoghen.

“This is part of the legal opinion being sought by the President,” a presidency source said, pleading not to be named.

Section 231 of the 1999 Constitution says: “(1)The appointment of a
person to the office of Chef Justice of Nigeria shall be made by the
President on the recommendation of the National Judicial Council subject
to confirmation of such appointment by the Senate.

“(2) The appointment of a person to the office of a Justice of the
Supreme Court shall be made by the President on the recommendation of
the National Judicial Council subject to confirmation of such
appointment by the Senate.

“(3) A person shall not be qualified to hold the office of Chief Justice
of Nigeria or of a Justice of the Supreme Court, unless he is qualified
to practise as a legal practitioner in Nigeria and has been so
qualified for a period of not less than fifteen years.

“(4) If the office of Chief Justice of Nigeria is vacant or if the
person holding the office is for any reason unable to perform the
functions of the office,’ then until a person has been appointed to and
has assumed the functions of that office, or until the person holding
the office has resumed those functions, the President shall point the
most senior Justice of the Supreme Court to perform those functions.

“(5) Except on the recommendation of the National Judicial Council,
appointment, pursuant to the provisions of subsection (4) of section
shall cease to have effect after the expiration of three months from the
date of such appointment, and the President shall not reappoint a
person whose appointment has lapsed.”

Part 1 of the Third Schedule to 1999 Constitution says: “The National Judicial Council shall have power to:

  • (b) recommend to
    the President the removal from office of
    the judicial officers specified in sub-paragraph (a) of this paragraph,
    and to exercise disciplinary control over such office’s;
  • (c)
    recommend to the Governors from among the list of persons submitted to
    it by the State Judicial Service  Commissions persons for appointments
    to the offices of the Chief Judges of the States and Judges of the High
    courts of the states, the Grand Kadis and Kadis of the sharia Courts of
    Appeal of the States and Presidents and Judges of the
    Customary Courts of Appeal of the States;
  • (d)
    recommend to the governors the removal from office of the judicial
    officers specified in sub-paragraph (c) of this paragraph, and to
    exercise disciplinary control over such officers;
  • (e) collect, control and disburse all moneys, capital and recurrent, for the judiciary;
  • (f)
    advise the President and governors or any matter pertaining to the
    judiciary as may be referred to the Council by the President or the
  • (g) appoint, dismiss and exercise disciplinary control over member and staff of the Council;
  • (h) control and disburse all monies, capital and recurrent. for the services of the Council; and
  • (i) deal with all other matters relating to broad issues of policy and administration.

Meanwhile, the NJC has recommended the confirmation of Justice Ibrahim
Tanko Muhammad as the substantive Chief Justice of Nigeria.

Another source said: “The council actually did not find him culpable of
infractions. He actually did not even want to be inaugurated as the
Acting CJN until there was evidence of an ex-parte order from the CCT on
Justice Onnoghen’s suspension.

“As the next in-command, the NJC said he should take over from the CJN.”

When contacted, a source in NJC said: “In line with Section 26 of the
Judicial Discipline Regulations of 2017, the council has reached out to
all those affected by its decisions.

Section 26 says: “The decision taken in regulation 25 of these
Regulations shall be notified to the following persons: (a)The subject
of the decision; (b)The Complainant and (c) The relevant Head of Court

“Upon a request made to the Council, the decision may be notified to any
other person. The grant or refusal of such request is in the absolute
discretion of the Council.”


Tony Orji

Dr. Tony Orji is the founder and owner of Success Tonics Blog. He is a Senior Lecturer at the Department of Economics, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button